The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition under Article 136, thereby affirming the judgment of the Delhi High Court in an intra court appeal. The ruling strengthened J. Duncan Healthcare’s position in ongoing arbitration proceedings involving claims exceeding one hundred crore rupees arising from disputes with the Central Medical Services Society.

BSNL filed a revision petition before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission challenging an order of the Gujarat State Consumer Commission. During the hearing, BSNL withdrew the petition. The Commission dismissed the matter as withdrawn and directed the State Commission to proceed with the original complaint expeditiously.

Themis Medicare challenged the rejection of its technical bid in a government procurement process concerning supply of Rifapentine tablets. The writ petition questioned the tender evaluation process before the Delhi High Court. The petition was subsequently withdrawn with liberty while preserving the petitioner’s rights to pursue departmental remedies.

Sapphire Media Services initiated a commercial petition before the Delhi High Court concerning contractual disputes with the Delhi Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation. During the course of proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement, which was formally recorded by the Court, resulting in disposal of the petition and all pending applications.

Proactive In and Out Advertising filed proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The request arose after the respondent declined to concur in the appointment process despite the existence of a valid arbitration clause.

Birla Century filed an arbitration petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court in relation to a commercial dispute arising from alleged breaches of contractual obligations by Orient Craft Limited. The proceedings concerned enforcement of arbitration rights and resolution of claims arising from the underlying commercial transaction.

A writ petition was filed before the Delhi High Court challenging the eligibility of a successful government contractor in a public procurement process. The petition alleged non-disclosure of serious pending investigations against the contractor and questioned the validity of the award decision taken by the government authority.

Patanjali Ayurved Limited instituted a civil suit seeking permanent and mandatory injunctions along with damages against individuals alleged to have made defamatory statements concerning its products. The company asserted that the statements caused reputational and commercial harm and sought judicial protection against further dissemination of such statements.

Super Plastronics initiated a commercial suit seeking specific performance of a purchase order for supply of television units and recovery of dues. The Court examined the question of territorial jurisdiction and concluded that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, resulting in the return of the plaint.

TUV SUD South Asia filed proceedings before the District and Sessions Court in Delhi seeking protection against termination of a contract by the Bureau of Indian Standards. The petition sought to restrain BIS from invoking an unconditional performance bank guarantee and challenged the legality of the termination action taken under the contractual arrangement.

Sapphire Media Services approached the Supreme Court through a Special Leave Petition concerning delays in listing its writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The matter related to contractual claims against Indian Oil Corporation Limited. The Supreme Court directed the High Court to hear the matter expeditiously and independently consider interim relief sought by the petitioner.

An appeal was filed before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal challenging the National Company Law Tribunal’s admission of an insolvency petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The appeal questioned the identity and standing of the alleged operational creditor and raised issues concerning the maintainability and validity of the insolvency proceedings initiated.

A detailed representation was filed before the Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana, seeking cancellation of a development licence for Sushant Lok III in Gurugram. The challenge alleged fraudulent misrepresentation and defective title, highlighting concealment of settled ownership disputes despite final civil court decrees and dismissal of the developers’ Special Leave Petition by the Supreme Court.

Foresight Law Offices advised Marcellus on the entry of global ice cream brand Carvel into the Indian market through a franchise model. The firm provided legal support on structuring the franchise arrangement and regulatory compliance. The mandate was led by Pranav Bhaskar, Partner at SKV, along with Kajal Gupta, Senior Associate at Foresight Law Offices.