Public procurement, defined as government or public-authority purchasing of goods, services and works, accounts for a substantial portion of public spending. In India, estimates suggest public procurement may represent close to 20–30 % of GDP. With such scale, the way tenders are designed and awarded has not only economic consequences but also environmental and social ones. Recognising this, a shift is underway: procurement is increasingly being used as a strategic tool to advance sustainability, rather than simply the cheapest upfront cost, referred as green procurement. This blog explores how sustainability is influencing tender law in India, with a focus on the legal mandates, policy drivers, and practical tools such as lifecycle costing and sustainability standards.
Why sustainability in public procurement matters
From first principles, governments have a strong case to integrate environmental and social criteria in procurement for several reasons:
- Scale of influence: With massive purchasing power, public authorities can influence suppliers, markets and innovation. For example, in India a large share of cement and steel consumption is driven by public infrastructure—so shifting procurement towards lower-carbon materials can have systemic effect.
- Environmental & social externalities: Traditional procurement often considers only the immediate purchase price and not downstream effects—energy use, maintenance, disposal, worker welfare, etc. Shifting to “green” procurement helps internalise these by pushing suppliers to deliver goods and services with lower negative externalities.
- Alignment with policy goals: India has commitments under the Paris Agreement, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and national targets on energy efficiency and circular economy. Procurement becomes a way to operationalise those.
- Best value for money across life-cycle: What looks cheapest at the start may cost more over lifetime (energy, maintenance, disposal). Tools like lifecycle costing (LCC) help shift the mindset from lowest price to “best value across lifetime”.
Hence, sustainability is not peripheral, it is increasingly central to procurement strategy and to the legal/tender-framework governing bids.
Legal and policy framework in India: what exists
(a) Legal mandates and government rules
In India, procurement is governed broadly by the General Financial Rules, 2017 (GFR) which apply to central government ministries. Significantly:
- Rule 173 of the GFR provides for “consideration of environmental criteria in procurement decision-making”, and mandates procurement of electrical appliances meeting the notified star-rating threshold of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE).
- Rule 153 provides for purchase preference to Micro & Small Enterprises (MSEs) consistent with the social dimension of procurement.
These rules demonstrate that the procurement framework allows, indeed directs, public bodies to embed environmental and social criteria. The recent report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) points out that the GFRs “provide the legal foundation for incorporating environmental criteria into tender documents”.
(b) Policy guidelines and green public procurement (GPP)
Beyond the GFR, India has been developing green procurement frameworks:
- The 2013 policy brief by The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) outlined that an “enabling procurement law should allow for incorporating sustainability factors while defining functional characteristics of the good/service to be procured, selection criteria, and evaluation methodology”.
- Guidelines such as the “Green Public Procurement Guidelines in India” (by ESMAP/World Bank) outline how procuring entities may integrate specifications, evaluation criteria, ecolabels etc.
- Studies by IISD and others point to the need to strengthen the policy framework, build competence, provide tools and monitor progress.
(c) Gaps and challenges
While the broad direction is set, there are notable gaps:
- There is no comprehensive dedicated Green Public Procurement Act in India that mandates all procuring entities to embed sustainability criteria uniformly.
- Market availability of sustainable goods and services is still limited in many categories, and procurers often default to lowest cost rather than lifecycle value.
- Capacity (skills, data, monitoring mechanisms) across procuring entities is still weak.
- Traditional tender law focuses heavily on “lowest responsive bid” or “most economically advantageous tender” but may not always accommodate or reward sustainability factors, unless explicitly embedded.
(d) Relevance to tender law, tender bidding and tender-law lawyers
From a legal perspective, tender law involves issues like: eligibility criteria, technical specifications, evaluation and award criteria, contract conditions, exclusion conditions, transparency and fairness of bidding. In a sustainability-driven procurement:
- Technical specifications may now include environmental criteria (e.g., minimum energy performance, recycled content, ecolabel certification).
- Evaluation criteria may include lifecycle cost rather than just upfront price, social criteria (e.g., labour standards) alongside environmental ones.
- Contract clauses may impose obligations on the supplier to meet sustainability standards during use and disposal.
- Exclusion criteria may disqualify bids from firms not meeting certain environmental/social certifications.
- A tender law lawyer advising a public authority or a bidder must now consider whether the tender documents comply with applicable sustainability mandates/criteria, both to guard against challenge (by unsuccessful bidder) and to ensure compliance with law/policy.
Thus sustainability becomes embedded in the law of tenders and bidding practice, not an optional extra.
Key tools & criteria: Lifecycle Costing, Sustainability Standards, Social Criteria
(a) Lifecycle Costing (LCC)
Lifecycle Costing is a methodology that takes into account all relevant costs over the life of a product or service, not just the purchase price. These costs may include installation, operation (energy, water, maintenance), end-of-life disposal or reuse, residual value, etc.
In the context of procurement, LCC allows a procuring authority to design tenders that reward bidders offering lower total cost of ownership, thus giving an advantage to higher-quality, more sustainable solutions with lower operating/maintenance costs, even if upfront price is higher. The IISD note states that unless LCC is integrated, there is a risk that sustainable procurement remains sidelined on the pretext of higher initial cost.
In India, while explicit mandated use of LCC is still emerging, policy guides and GPP frameworks recommend it. For instance, the “Green Public Procurement in India” report outlines lifecycle thinking as one of the tools for procurers.
For a tender-law lawyer advising a procuring authority, key considerations include: whether the tender document specifies how LCC will be computed, what assumptions/discount rate will be used, how the evaluation method treats higher upfront cost but lower lifetime cost, and how to ensure transparency so bidders know how evaluation is done.
(b) Sustainability standards and ecolabels
Incorporating sustainability standards involves specifying in tender documents that goods, services or works must meet certain environmental or social standards, for example:
- Energy efficiency ratings (such as BEE star-ratings for appliances in India).
- Ecolabelling schemes (like the Ecomark Scheme in India) which identify environmentally preferable products.
- Certification requirements (e.g., for suppliers’ environmental management systems, human rights/labour standards).
- Minimum recycled content, targets for reduced greenhouse gas emissions, use of low-carbon materials (e.g., in construction). For example, the RMI/CAI report discusses leveraging GPP to favour low-carbon cement/steel in infrastructure procurement.
From a tender-law perspective, key legal design considerations are: the specification must be non-discriminatory (i.e., it must allow equivalent solutions), the criteria must be proportionate to the object of the contract, and must be clearly set out so bidders know how to comply and how they will be evaluated.
(c) Social criteria and wider sustainability
Sustainability is not only about environmental criteria. Increasingly, social aspects are entering public procurement:
- Preference to MSEs (micro & small enterprises) under Rule 153 GFR.
- Requirements on supplier labour standards, human rights, gender equality, local employment provisions (in some sustainable procurement policies). For example, the sustainable procurement policy of NBCC (India) Limited (a public-sector undertaking) states that suppliers must comply with standards such as no use of child labour, safe working environment, non-discrimination, eco-friendly packaging.
- Contract performance conditions may require the supplier to report on social/environmental indicators, or face penalties for non-compliance.
Thus, tender documents increasingly adopt multi-criteria evaluation, not just price and technical specification, but also environmental/social performance.
How tender law is being reshaped: Implications for bidders and procuring authorities
(a) For procuring authorities
- Tender drafting must now integrate sustainability criteria from the outset: the specification sheet, eligibility, evaluation criteria, bid documents, contract conditions all must reflect sustainability objectives (environmental + social).
- Authorities must develop or adopt tools such as LCC calculators, ecolabel/standard lists, supplier-vetting processes, monitoring mechanisms.
- The evaluation methodology must reflect the value of the sustainability criteria: for example, awarding weightage to environmental performance, or factoring lifetime costs. This means abandoning purely “lowest cost” mindset in favour of “most economically advantageous tender” (MEAT) with sustainability embedded.
- Transparency is key. Bidders must understand how their sustainability credentials will be assessed. Failure to do so may lead to legal challenges in tendering. A tender-law lawyer must ensure that evaluation criteria are clear, objective and non-discriminatory.
- Monitoring and contract management: Embedding sustainability in tender is only the first step; ensuring the supplier delivers on those commitments (e.g., energy performance, waste reduction) is equally important.
(b) For bidders
- Bidders must read tender documents carefully for sustainability specifications and evaluation criteria—these are no longer “nice to have” but may be mandatory.
- They may need to invest in greener technologies, certifications, supplier chains that meet required standards. Thus, bidders need to ask: what is the lifecycle cost of our proposal, how do we document our environmental/social credentials, what warranties or post-delivery obligations are there?
- Bidders should engage early: market signals arising from GPP mean that suppliers who position themselves as “green” may gain competitive advantage. For example, in a tender favouring low-carbon materials or energy efficient goods, a bidder with prior certification or track record may stand out.
- Tender-law lawyers advising bidders must help them assess whether the tender’s sustainability criteria are lawful (e.g., proportionate, non-discriminatory), whether the supply chain can meet the obligations, whether the bid should propose innovative “green” solutions and how to price lifecycle cost impacts.
(c) Legal issues and risk management
- Challenges: A bidder that is disadvantaged because of sustainability criteria may challenge the tender on grounds of discrimination, unfair specification, or ambiguity in evaluation methodology. To mitigate, the procuring authority must ensure criteria are transparent, objective and justified. The tender-law lawyer plays a key role here.
- Contractual liability: If the contract imposes sustainability obligations (e.g., maintain energy efficiency for 5 years), the supplier must ensure compliance or face penalties; bidders should assess risk.
- Market maturity: Since green technologies or sustainable alternatives may still be emerging, authorities and bidders should ensure the market can supply; otherwise, specification may become a barrier rather than enabling. As noted in India, limited market availability and higher upfront costs are challenges. IISD
- Documentation and proof: Sustainability credentials and certifications must be verifiable. Procuring authorities must build mechanisms for verification and monitoring; bidders must gather necessary evidence.
The Indian context: Opportunities and constraints
| Opportunities | Constraints |
| 1. India’s large public procurement volume means the shift to green procurement can yield large aggregate benefits—lower environmental footprint, stimulation of green markets and innovation. The IISD report for India notes that GPP “can mean leveraging 30 % of its GDP for sustainable consumption and production”.
2. Existing policy signals, GFR rules, national guidelines, ecolabelling schemes, provide a foundation for scaling up. 3. Some organisations (e.g., NBCC) are adopting formal sustainable procurement policies. 4. Infrastructure, construction and built-environment sectors provide significant scope (cement, steel, materials). The report by RMI/CAI highlights how GPP can help shift demand toward low-carbon materials. |
1. As flagged earlier, lack of a dedicated procurement law mandating green criteria across all public authorities means implementation is patchy.
2. Capacity constraints: Many procuring bodies may lack the technical expertise to design and evaluate sustainability components, to perform LCC, or to monitor performance. 3. Market readiness: Some sustainable products or technologies may not be readily available or may carry a premium, creating resistance. The lifecycle cost argument helps but procurers may still focus on upfront price. 4. Data and tools: Lifecycle cost analyses require data, discounting assumptions, modelling which may not be standardised or uniformly applied. 5.Legal-procurement culture: The mindset of awarding to the lowest bid is entrenched; moving to MEAT (most economically advantageous tender) with sustainability criteria is a behavioural and institutional shift.
|
Opportunities
- As flagged earlier, lack of a dedicated procurement law mandating green criteria across all public authorities means implementation is patchy.
- Capacity constraints: Many procuring bodies may lack the technical expertise to design and evaluate sustainability components, to perform LCC, or to monitor performance.
- Market readiness: Some sustainable products or technologies may not be readily available or may carry a premium, creating resistance. The lifecycle cost argument helps but procurers may still focus on upfront price.
- Data and tools: Lifecycle cost analyses require data, discounting assumptions, modelling which may not be standardised or uniformly applied.
- Legal-procurement culture: The mindset of awarding to the lowest bid is entrenched; moving to MEAT (most economically advantageous tender) with sustainability criteria is a behavioural and institutional shift.
Conclusion
Sustainability is no longer a peripheral concern in public procurement, it is becoming embedded in the legal and policy architecture that governs tendering and bidding in India. For procuring authorities, this means designing tenders that integrate environmental and social criteria, adopting lifecycle costing, treating sustainability as part of value for money, and ensuring contract management monitors delivery. For bidders and tender-law lawyers, it means paying close attention to sustainability criteria in tender documents, investing in sustainable solutions and certifications, and understanding how evaluation and contract conditions treat sustainability obligations.
In India, while the legislative and policy frameworks are still evolving, the direction is clear. The shift from “lowest cost” to “best value across lifecycle” is underway. The risk for any party involved in public procurement, whether procuring body, bidder or legal adviser, is that if they ignore sustainability, they will fall behind. Equally, if they embrace sustainability thoughtfully, they can gain competitive advantage and contribute to a more sustainable public spending paradigm.
For anyone interested in tender law, procurement practice, or sustainable supply-chains in India, this is an area of compelling change. Integrating green procurement is not just about being “ethical” or “green”, it is increasingly about complying with law, reducing risks, achieving long-term value, and shaping markets. As India scales up infrastructure, public services and procurement volumes, sustainability in tenders will not just be desirable—it will be indispensable.
