Appeal before the Delhi High Court challenging the release of the film “Nyay: The Justice,” alleging unauthorized and exploitative portrayal of the petitioner’s deceased son’s life story. The Court issued notices and listed the matter for further hearing, with the film already in public circulation.
Intellectual Property Rights
Securing Innovation, Protecting Creative and Commercial Value
The Practice
Foresight Law Offices India advises businesses, innovators, startups, creators, and brand owners on the protection, commercialisation, enforcement, and management of intellectual property rights (IPR) across India. The firm assists clients in safeguarding brands, creative works, proprietary assets, technology, and business-critical intellectual property in increasingly competitive and technology-driven markets.
The firm regularly advises on contentious and non-contentious intellectual property matters involving trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets, brand protection, licensing, and enforcement strategy.
Services we offer
Trademark & Brand Protection
- Trademark prosecution and portfolio management
- Brand protection and enforcement strategy
- Opposition, rectification, and infringement proceedings
- Advisory on brand licensing and commercialisation
Copyright & Creative Rights
- Copyright registration and protection advisory
- Content, media, and digital asset protection
- Licensing, assignment, and commercial exploitation advisory
- Copyright enforcement and infringement disputes
Patent & Technology Advisory
- Patent filing coordination and portfolio strategy
- Technology protection and commercialisation advisory
- Advisory relating to software, digital assets, and innovation-driven businesses
- Intellectual property strategy for technology and emerging sectors
IP Enforcement & Disputes
- Intellectual property litigation and dispute management
- Counterfeiting, passing off, and infringement actions
- Interim relief and enforcement proceedings
- Cross-border brand protection and dispute strategy
Practice Approach
Foresight Law Offices India works closely with businesses, founders, and rights holders in developing commercially aligned intellectual property strategies across sectors. The firm combines regulatory understanding, dispute capability, and commercial insight in advising clients on the protection, enforcement, and strategic management of intellectual property assets.
Area of Expertise
Key Deals & Landmark Matters
Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A. Saraogi & Ors.
Aryan Educational Society v. C.D. Goyal Foundation
Commercial suit before the Delhi High Court alleging trademark infringement of the name “The Aryan School” by the defendant. The Court issued notice and the matter is at the pre-trial stage, with pleadings underway and the infringement claims pending adjudication.
Aman Dhattarwal & Anr. v. Siddharth Choudhary & Ors.
Civil suit before the Delhi High Court concerning disputed intellectual property rights in the education technology sector. The petitioners challenged unauthorized use of their proprietary content and branding, seeking judicial protection of their established rights in the rapidly evolving ed-tech space.
Super Plastronics Pvt. Ltd. v. A2D Channel & Ors
Commercial suit before the Delhi High Court seeking protection against defamatory YouTube content published by A2D Channel, which falsely portrayed the petitioner’s Kodak-branded televisions as fraudulent. The petitioner sought injunctive relief and damages for the reputational and commercial harm caused by the misleading videos.
The Aryan Educational Society v. Aaryan International School
Civil suit before the Delhi High Court for trademark and copyright infringement in the education sector. The petitioner challenged the defendant’s use of a deceptively similar name and associated branding, seeking injunctive relief and damages to protect its established intellectual property rights.
Patanjali Ayurved Ltd Vs Raj Shamani & Ors.
Patanjali Ayurved Limited instituted a civil suit seeking permanent and mandatory injunctions along with damages against individuals alleged to have made defamatory statements concerning its products. The company asserted that the statements caused reputational and commercial harm and sought judicial protection against further dissemination of such statements.
Events
Led a workshop organised by the Trial Advocacy Society, guiding participants on dispute resolution strategies and enforcement mechanisms in intellectual property law.
The conference brought together policymakers, legal practitioners, financial institutions, and technology leaders to examine the evolving IT and payments regulatory landscape within the U.S.–India partnership. Discussions focused on digital payments regulation, data governance, and the challenges facing global payment networks,
The Summit brought together leaders from policy, law, technology, and global trade to discuss regulation, innovation, and globalization. Conversations spanned regulatory frameworks, digital finance, cybersecurity, arbitration, and cross-border compliance — marking a step toward India's vision for Viksit Bharat 2047.
Varun Singh moderated a panel on India's rapidly evolving arbitration landscape, with a clear push towards ADR and minimal judicial intervention. The panel reflected on India positioning itself as a global arbitration hub, with 2026 potentially marking a defining moment
Media Coverage
The Delhi high court has paved the way for domestic drugmaker Natco Pharma Ltd to launch a generic version of Roche’s Risdiplam, a drug used to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)—a rare genetic disorder that causes motor neuron degeneration and progressive muscle weakness.
Some brand names or trade names become so deeply rooted in the minds of the public that consumers immediately associate a product or service with that particular name. In legal terms, such brand names are classified as “well-known trademarks” under Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Top cricketers earned hefty sums from fantasy-gaming tie-ups until recently. Virat Kohli drew around INR 10–12 crore annually from MPL, while Mahendra Singh Dhoni earned about INR 6–7 crore from Winzo, as per reports. Collectively, endorsements across leading players were estimated at INR 150–200 crore a year.
A recent Delhi High Court ruling allowing arbitrary and distinctive numerical combinations to be eligible to be registered as a trademark in India may result in multiple litigations of similar looking, sounding, and appearing trademarks, legal experts said.