Supreme Court held arbitrator wrongly awarded interest contrary to contractual bar; set aside award and High Court judgment, allowing Union of India appeal and disallowing pendente lite and future interest.
Dispute Management & Litigation
Strategic Representation Across Every Stage of Conflict Resolution
The Practice
Foresight Law Offices India advises corporates, financial institutions, promoters, multinational businesses, and individuals in complex commercial dispute management & litigation disputes, regulatory proceedings, and litigation matters across India. The firm represents clients in high-stakes and sensitive disputes involving commercial transactions, shareholder conflicts, insolvency proceedings, contractual claims, regulatory actions, and business-critical litigation.
The firm regularly appears before the Supreme Court of India, High Courts, tribunals, commercial courts, arbitral tribunals, and regulatory forums across jurisdictions.
Services we offer
Commercial Litigation
- Commercial and contractual disputes
- Shareholder and promoter disputes
- Banking and financial litigation
- Recovery and enforcement proceedings
Arbitration & Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Domestic and international arbitration
- Interim relief and enforcement proceedings
- Arbitration strategy and dispute management
- Mediation and negotiated settlement advisory
Regulatory & Sectoral Disputes
- Regulatory investigations and enforcement proceedings
- Insolvency and restructuring disputes
- Securities and financial regulatory litigation
- White collar and economic offence-related proceedings
Constitutional & Appellate Matters
- Writ proceedings before High Courts
- Appellate litigation and special leave proceedings
- Representation before tribunals and quasi-judicial authorities
- Strategic advisory in complex and multi-forum disputes
Practice Approach
Foresight Law Offices India combines dispute strategy, commercial understanding, and courtroom capability in advising clients through complex and business-sensitive disputes. The firm works closely with clients in managing litigation risk, protecting commercial interests, and navigating disputes across courts, tribunals, arbitral forums, and regulatory authorities
Key Deals & Landmark Matters
Union of India v. Manraj Enterprises
OM Logistics Limited v. Orientcraft Limited
OM Logistics filed Section 11(6) petition before Delhi High Court seeking appointment of sole arbitrator for disputes under agreements; respondent failed to participate despite service of notice.
SGS India Pvt. Ltd. v. Bureau of Indian Standards
SGS India filed Section 9 petition against BIS; after arbitrator appointment and failed mediation, petitioner withdrew petition to pursue remedies before arbitrator; Court dismissed petition as withdrawn.
Mayur Khah v. Shubh Mathur
Mayur Khah filed Section 11 petition before Delhi High Court seeking arbitrator appointment in ₹1.24 crore dispute; Court directed DIAC appointment, keeping all rights and objections open.
Handicraft and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India v. SMC Comtrade Limited
Court heard connected arbitration appeals on order directing HHEC to secure ₹5 crore; HHEC opposed, SMC sought enhancement; matters decided together arising from same arbitral order.
M/s Proactive In & Out Advertising Pvt. Ltd. v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.
Proactive Advertising filed Section 9 petition challenging termination of advertising contract and encashment of bank guarantee by AAI, seeking interim protection pending arbitration on contractual and force majeure disputes.
Ashwin Venkatraman v. Rachit Raj
Ashwin Venkatraman filed Section 9 petition seeking interim relief in arbitration dispute; due to repeated non appearance and lack of prosecution, petition was dismissed by Saket Court in May 2023.
M/s Atul Cryogenic Gases v. M/s Aryaveer Motors Private Limited
Atul Cryogenic Gases filed RFA Commercial appeal before Delhi High Court challenging orders in commercial dispute; matter pending with repeated adjournments, next hearing scheduled in April 2026.
Nidan v. Vardhman Family Group
Nidan filed arbitration case before Patna Sadar District Court concerning disputes with Vardhman Family Group; matter is pending at admission stage.
M/s ARS Greenview Farms Pvt. Ltd. v. Magic Ruby Investment Services LLP & Ors.
ARS Greenview Farms filed arbitration petition before Delhi High Court; Court referred parties to mediation at Delhi High Court Mediation Centre, listing matter for further hearing if settlement fails.
M/s J. Duncan Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs Central Medical Services Society
The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition under Article 136, thereby affirming the judgment of the Delhi High Court in an intra court appeal. The ruling strengthened J. Duncan Healthcare’s position in ongoing arbitration proceedings involving claims exceeding one hundred crore rupees arising from disputes with the Central Medical Services Society.
M/s Proactive In and Out Advertising Pvt. Ltd. v. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation
Proactive In and Out Advertising filed proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The request arose after the respondent declined to concur in the appointment process despite the existence of a valid arbitration clause.
Birla Century Vs Orient Craft Ltd
Birla Century filed an arbitration petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court in relation to a commercial dispute arising from alleged breaches of contractual obligations by Orient Craft Limited. The proceedings concerned enforcement of arbitration rights and resolution of claims arising from the underlying commercial transaction.
Super Plastronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Infotel Business Solution Ltd.
Super Plastronics initiated a commercial suit seeking specific performance of a purchase order for supply of television units and recovery of dues. The Court examined the question of territorial jurisdiction and concluded that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, resulting in the return of the plaint.
TUV SUD South Asia Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bureau of Indian Standards
TUV SUD South Asia filed proceedings before the District and Sessions Court in Delhi seeking protection against termination of a contract by the Bureau of Indian Standards. The petition sought to restrain BIS from invoking an unconditional performance bank guarantee and challenged the legality of the termination action taken under the contractual arrangement.
Events
Media Coverage
Imagine a corporate debtor undergoing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Every rupee lying in its bank accounts becomes critical to […]
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Amendment Bill (“IBC Amendment Bill, 2025”) was tabled in the Lok Sabha on August 12, […]
In India, the insolvency law is governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Insolvency of a company comprises of […]