Supreme Court appeal for recovery of retrospective license fee arrears running into several crores. The central legal issue is whether communications between the parties constitute an acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, sufficient to extend the prescribed limitation period.
High Stakes Complex Commercial Litigation
Strategic Advocacy for High-Value Disputes
At Foresight Law Offices, our Complex Commercial Litigation practice represents businesses, institutions, and individuals in high-value disputes requiring rigorous legal strategy, deep commercial understanding, and skilled advocacy before courts, tribunals, and appellate forums across India.
Services we offer
Commercial Litigation & Contract Disputes
- Representation in commercial suits involving breach of contract, recovery, and declaratory relief
- Injunctions, attachments, and urgent interim relief in time-sensitive disputes
- Enforcement and execution of decrees, attachment, and recovery proceedings
Appellate & Supreme Court Litigation
- Appeals before high courts and the Supreme Court in commercial and corporate matters
- Complex constitutional and regulatory challenges requiring senior advocacy
- Precise legal analysis and appellate strategy in high-stakes proceedings
Fraud & Asset Recovery
- Litigation arising from commercial fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty
- Asset tracing, recovery proceedings, and urgent injunctive relief
- Parallel civil and criminal remedies in fraud and financial misconduct matters
Corporate & Shareholder Disputes
- Representation in oppression, mismanagement, and corporate governance disputes
- Breach of shareholder agreements and promoter-investor conflicts
- Proceedings before courts, NCLT, and NCLAT as required
Government & Regulatory Litigation
- Challenges to governmental actions, regulatory orders, and public procurement decisions
- Writ petitions and appeals before high courts and the Supreme Court
- Policy challenge litigation and regulatory enforcement defence
International & Cross-Border Disputes
- Enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in India
- Coordination with international counsel in multi-jurisdictional disputes
- Management of parallel proceedings across multiple jurisdictions
Area of Expertise
Key Deals & Landmark Matters
New Mangalore Port Trust v. Clifford D’Souza & Ors.
Alok Kumar v. State of Bihar
Supreme Court matter consolidating 81 FIRs arising from a real estate fraud with over ₹7 crore in settlement deposits. The case illustrates how consolidation of overlapping criminal proceedings can be used as a mechanism to facilitate large-scale compensation recovery for aggrieved homebuyers.
P.S. Maini v. Avtar Singh & Anr.
Supreme Court appeal in a medical negligence matter. A strategic humanitarian settlement was negotiated, enabling the doctor to pay a defined sum without admitting liability. This approach secured prompt relief for the claimant while preserving the professional reputation and record of the medical practitioner.
Miss Kiara Rawat v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court writ petition seeking government funding for Zolgensma gene therapy worth ₹17.50 crore for a critically ill child. The Court converted the matter into a policy intervention, directing a high-level committee to reform the National Policy for Rare Diseases and its crowdfunding mechanisms.
Harjit Singh Kochhar v. Tej Arjun Singh Kochhar & Ors.
Supreme Court matter addressing impleadment of a grandson in a Hindu Undivided Family partition suit. The case examined whether all members with a potential stake in ancestral property must be parties to ensure a complete, binding, and equitable resolution of the family dispute.
Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ors. v. Lokpal of India
The Delhi High Court quashed Lokpal proceedings initiated against the Defence Secretary and other senior public servants, confirming that the Lokpal’s jurisdiction is strictly limited to offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and does not extend to purely administrative or procedural lapses in service matters.
Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. High Court of Rajasthan
Senior judicial officer challenged repeated transfers close to retirement; the Supreme Court requested the Acting Chief Justice to review his representation sympathetically, recognising health concerns, family circumstances, and tenure stability as relevant considerations.
Kiran Sharma & Others v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Others
Fifteen Protection Officers challenged a fresh recruitment advertisement for posts they already held; the Central Administrative Tribunal disposed of the matter, affirming their appointments and service rights as upheld by prior Supreme Court orders.
Aarav Jain & Ors. v. Bihar Public Service Commission & Ors.
Eight highly-ranked candidates for Civil Judge posts were arbitrarily rejected for not producing original documents at interview; the Supreme Court directed immediate appointment and notional seniority, upholding merit over procedural technicality.
Kanchana Rai v. Geeta Sharma & Ors.
A Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court of India concerned a family estate dispute worth over ₹41,000 crore, arising from a rejected maintenance claim. The Court examined whether a widow daughter-in-law who becomes a widow after the death of her father-in-law can claim maintenance from his estate under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Upholding the High Court, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 21 includes any widow of a son as a dependant, regardless of timing. A widow unable to maintain herself is entitled to maintenance……
Themis Medicare Limited & Anr. Vs Central Medical Services Society & Ors.
Themis Medicare challenged the rejection of its technical bid in a government procurement process concerning supply of Rifapentine tablets. The writ petition questioned the tender evaluation process before the Delhi High Court. The petition was subsequently withdrawn with liberty while preserving the petitioner’s rights to pursue departmental remedies.
M/s Proactive In and Out Advertising Pvt. Ltd. v. Pepsu Road Transport Corporation
Proactive In and Out Advertising filed proceedings before the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The request arose after the respondent declined to concur in the appointment process despite the existence of a valid arbitration clause.
M/s I.V.S. Lanka Private Limited Vs Union Of India & Anr.
A writ petition was filed before the Delhi High Court challenging the eligibility of a successful government contractor in a public procurement process. The petition alleged non-disclosure of serious pending investigations against the contractor and questioned the validity of the award decision taken by the government authority.
Super Plastronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Infotel Business Solution Ltd.
Super Plastronics initiated a commercial suit seeking specific performance of a purchase order for supply of television units and recovery of dues. The Court examined the question of territorial jurisdiction and concluded that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi, resulting in the return of the plaint.
TUV SUD South Asia Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bureau of Indian Standards
TUV SUD South Asia filed proceedings before the District and Sessions Court in Delhi seeking protection against termination of a contract by the Bureau of Indian Standards. The petition sought to restrain BIS from invoking an unconditional performance bank guarantee and challenged the legality of the termination action taken under the contractual arrangement.
Events
Led a workshop organised by the Trial Advocacy Society, guiding participants on dispute resolution strategies and enforcement mechanisms in intellectual property law.
Varun Singh spoke as an esteemed panellist on how embracing robust legal frameworks is key to achieving the ambitious goals of Viksit Bharat 2047, and how MSMEs can navigate legal complexities to thrive and contribute to a stronger economy.
The Summit brought together leaders from policy, law, technology, and global trade to discuss regulation, innovation, and globalization. Conversations spanned regulatory frameworks, digital finance, cybersecurity, arbitration, and cross-border compliance — marking a step toward India's vision for Viksit Bharat 2047.
Varun Singh moderated a panel on India's rapidly evolving arbitration landscape, with a clear push towards ADR and minimal judicial intervention. The panel reflected on India positioning itself as a global arbitration hub, with 2026 potentially marking a defining moment
Media Coverage
New Delhi: Days after the Supreme Court questioned the functioning of the RERA, experts said lack of intent by RERA chiefs, poor coordination with state governments, and inadequate use of existing powers have limited the effectiveness of regulators across India, underscoring the need for major reforms to protect homebuyers.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday observed that the price surge of air tickets during festive seasons and holidays is a "serious" concern, calling into question the unpredictable fluctuations in air fares and ancillary charges levied by private airlines.
For decades, Indian businesses relied on size as a shield against regulatory risks and commercial disputes. Large law firms, expansive teams, and layered hierarchies were assumed to guarantee safety.
Motor accident compensation law in India is undergoing a quiet but decisive shift. Across Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and constitutional […]
Sushant Singh Rajput incurred expenses worth ₹16.80 lakh on Rhea Chakraborty during the 14 months they were in a live-in relationship, money which cannot be described as having been embezzled, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) concluded in its closure report into the actor’s death.
The death of Sushant Singh Rajput is once again in the headlines after the actor’s family has announced that they are going to challenge CBI’s final closure report on the case that was filed by Sushant’s father, K.K. Singh. The report in question was submitted earlier his year in March.
Anticipatory bail is a prior remedy and an application for bail for an offence in which the punishment is that of imprisonment. In the newly enforced Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 482 provides for anticipatory, whereas, earlier, Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 provided for the same.
In India, medical negligence cases are dealt with under tort law. This means that medical negligence is treated as a civil wrong. A civil wrong means that the act and effect of the act infringe a right of an individual.
The issue came to light when the promised date of possession was coming near. The 62 homebuyers asked the builder repeatedly about the substantial delay in construction of the flats. The responses given by the builder were found to be vague and non-committed, which further raised suspicion among the home